Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Chi Running: How It Has Helped Me After Major Knee Surgery
In the fall of 2002 I was playing in a
men’s Sunday morning soccer game. While playing outside left
fullback a ball was struck in my direction but was way over my head.
I thought I could head it by jumping. No dice. The ball was so far
over my head I would have needed a ladder. As I came down my leg was
straight and my body was turning. My cleat did what it’s supposed
to do and firmly grounded my left foot. Unfortunately the rest of my
body turned and put a lot of pressure on my straight leg. An
explosion of pain rippled up through my leg and I landed on my side
writhing in agony.
To make a long story short an MRI
revealed that I had blown the ACL, MCL and PCL. Plus a hamstring
detached as well as the muscle bundle at the top of the fibula. I
ended up having 6 hours or surgery to install cadaver ligaments and
to reattach the muscles. The surgeon also had to sever my quadriceps
to repair something behind it. I had to wait a month before starting
the 7 months of PT to ensure that the reattached muscles were
grafting back to the bone. In addition, the surgeon told me that the
replacement MCL couldn’t be made as tight as factory-installed MCL
so my leg has a slight instability even with the strengthening
exercises I did and continue to do. I need to wear a custom-made ACL
brace for tennis, refereeing soccer and skiing. But at least I can
continue to do them!
Why am I telling this story? To talk a
little about a running technique that I found during my rehab. I
found that traditional running where the heel hits first put a lot of
pressure on my repaired knee even with the brace. I happened to be at
a party shortly after my rehab was completed and started talking to a
fellow who was a fellow technique geek. He told me about the Pose
method of running which uses a different running technique. When I
read the book on it I happened to stumble on ChiRunning and Danny
Dreyer’s book and DVD on this. http://www.chirunning.com/
I’m probably not doing ChiRunning justice in my description of the
method involves having the landing leg staying under the body as
opposed to reaching out and landing on the heel. My landing foot
stays directly below my center of gravity. It also involves leaning
my body forward so that it almost feels like I’m falling. My lower
legs lift behind me almost as though I'm trying to kick myself in the
rear.
I’m not guaranteeing I’m doing the
ChiRunning 100% correct. But I can say that what I’m doing now has
helped significantly reduce the pain in my leg while also lessening
the pounding my body feels. It also seems to take less effort to run
this way.
Inner Game of Tennis - 40th Anniversary: Some Thoughts
Tennis magazine recently ran an article
on the 40th anniversary of The Inner Game of Tennis. While I’ve
been a big fan of Inner Tennis I have to admit that I still struggle
knowing exactly how to apply Gallwey's ideas or if I’m even
interpreting them correctly. I recall that he tells stories in his
book how he helped beginners learn how to play by not doing what
traditional coaches do. I know he believes traditional coaching has
players over-focus on the details of the mechanics. I recall Gallwey
had the student watch him execute, say, a forehand several times then
had them do it. Or he has the student swing in front of a mirror.
While I think Gallwey’s approach is valid I also think there is
time when it is appropriate to be aware of the mechanics and work on
them until they become automatized.
Here is a recent personal example. I’ve
noticed that the many of the pros hit the ball on their groundstrokes
with their racket tilted slightly forward by several degrees at
impact. This produces a somewhat flatter shot but still with topspin.
So I started trying it by consciously setting my racket with a slight
forward tilt. Eventually I didn’t have to think about doing it; it
became automatic.
In his second book on inner tennis
Gallwey even mentions the idea of not consciously choosing targets
but letting the Self 2 figure out where to put the ball. I do apply
this especially on certain shots. The one that comes to mind is when
I’m on the ad court in doubles and the cross court opponent is
coming to the net. One of my favorite shots is to hit a short
crosscourt ball that just clears the net then dips sharply and lands
in the outside alley. Yet I can’t describe exactly what I’m doing
different with my stroke to make the ball to that. I just know that’s
what I want to do and let the rest happen. If I think about how to
make that stroke I’m more likely to miss. Maybe that’s an
application of Inner Tennis.
The compromise I’ve developed is when
I’m trying a new tweak to a technique I’ll focus on it until it
becomes automatic. If I’m not working on any technique in
particular I then focus on weight transfer, the point of impact and
trying to watch the ball hit the strings from behind the racket (i.e.
looking at the impact point through the strings). My tendency is to
let the ball come in too close. One of these days I’ll get it
right! ;-)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)